References

Home
References
Links
Circuit Rules
News
Official Stats
Victims
Quotes
Rule Changes
Judicial Oversight
Secret Dockets

                                                     References

Affirmance Without Opinion

General:

bulletMartha Dragich, Will the Federal Courts of Appeals Perish If They Publish? Or Does the Declining Use of Opinions to Explain and Justify Judicial Decisions Pose a Greater Threat?, 44 Am. U. L. Rev. 757 (1995)
bulletPatricia Wald, The Problem with the Courts: Black-Robed Bureaucracy or Collegiality Under Challenge, 42 Md. L. Rev. 766 (1983)
bulletRobert M. Parker, Speech by Fifth Circuit Judge Parker before The Commission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals, March 25, 1998  ("The statistics regarding the utilization of Local Rule 47.6 are deceiving . . .")
bulletPhilip Soper, A Theory of Law (1984)
bulletWilliam Reynolds & William Richman, An Evaluation of Limited Publication in the United States Courts of Appeals: The Price of Reform, 48 U. Chi. L. Rev. 573 (1981)
bulletWilliam Reynolds & William Richman, The Non-Precedential Precedent — Limited Publication and No-Citation Rules in the United States Courts of Appeals, 78 Colum. L. Rev. 1167 (1978)
bulletWilliam Richman & William Reynolds, Elitism, Expediency, and the New Certiorari: Requiem for the Learned Hand Tradition, 81 Cornell L. Rev. 273 (1996)
bulletRichard W. Fulmer, Does Court Time-Saving Cost Liberty?, Ideas on Liberty, November, 2002, Pages 39-42.  See Foundation for Economic Education
bulletWilliam C. Smith, Big Objections to Brief Decisions, ABA Journal 34 (August 1999) - The ABA Journal is published monthly by the American Bar Association.  Reprinted by permission of the ABA Journal.
bulletDeborah Jones Merritt & James J. Brudney, Stalking Secret Law: What Predicts Publication in the United States, 54 Vand. L. Rev. 71, 119 (2001)
bulletPaul D. Carrington, Daniel J. Meador and Maurice Rosenberg, Justice on Appeal  10 (West 1976)
bulletCharles E. Carpenter, Jr., The No Citation Rule For Unpublished Opinions — Do The Ends Of Expediency For Overloaded Appellate Courts Justify The Means Of Secrecy?, 50 South Carolina Law Review 235 (1998)
bulletWilliam Glaberson, Caseload Forcing Two-Level System for U.S. Appeals, New York Times, March 14, 1999.
bulletLon Fuller, The Morality of Law, Yale Univ. Press (1977)
bulletEron Berg, Unpublished Decisions: Routine Cases or Shadow Precedents?, Washington State Bar News, December, 2000 - Discusses unpublished decisions in Washington State Courts.  Concludes that unpublished decisions are less likely to be heard by the Washington State Supreme Court than published decisions.
bulletCarl Tobias, THE NEW CERTIORARI AND A NATIONAL STUDY OF THE APPEALS COURTS, 81 Cornell L. Rev. 1264 (1996) - Comments on William Richman & William Reynolds 1996 Cornell Law Review article referenced above.
bullet

ABA Commission of Standards of Judicial Administration, Standards Relating to Appellate Courts (1977)

bullet

Advisory Council for Appellate Justice, FJC Research Series No. 73-2, Standards for Publication of Judicial Opinions (1973)

bullet

Commission on Revision of the Federal Court Appellate System, Structure and Internal Procedures: Recommendations for Change, 67 F.R.D. 195, 258 (1975).  (Known as the Hruska Commission.)

bulletAntonin Scalia, The Press and the Law, speech given at Washington Hebrew Congregation (Mar. 4, 1990)
bulletAlvin Rubin, Bureaucratization of the Federal Courts: The Tension Between Justice and Efficiency, 55 Notre Dame Law. 648 (1980)
bulletBlack’s Law Dictionary (6th ed. 1990)
bulletBoard of the Federal Judicial Center, Recommendation and Report to the April 1972 Session of the Judicial Conference of the United States on the Publication of Courts of Appeals Opinions (1972)
bulletChief Judge Howard T. Markey, Remarks at the Seventh Annual Judicial Conference of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (May 24, 1989), 128 F.R.D. 409 (1989)
bulletFrank M. Coffin, The Ways of a Judge: Reflections From the Federal Appellate Bench (1980)
bulletHenry Friendly, Some Kind of Hearing, 123 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1267 (1975)
bulletJudicial Conference of the United States Report (1974)
bulletJudicial Conference of the Unites States Report (1964)
bulletJudicial Conference of the Unites States Report (1972)
bulletKarl Llewellyn, The Common Law Tradition (1960)
bulletCharles Evans Hughes, The Supreme Court of the United States, 1928
bulletBryan A. Garner, Style of Opinions, The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, ed. by Kermit L. Hall (1992), p. 607-611
bulletPolly J. Price, Precedent and Judicial Power after the Founding, 42 Boston College Law Rev., 81-122 (December 2000)
bulletDanny J. Boggs & Brian P. Brooks, Unpublished Opinions & the Nature of Precedent, 4 Green Bag 2d 17 (2000)  (www.greenbag.org)
bulletAn Article on the Rule of Law by Walter Williams at CapitalismMagazine.com
bulletAnother Rule of Law Article by Walter Williams - July, 2002
bulletFederal Judicial Center, Case Management Procedures in the Federal Court of Appeals, 2000  (see Official Stats)
bulletCommission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals   -  this is a rich vein of commentary from many judges and other commentators on issues facing the federal judiciary, hosted by the North Texas University Library on behalf of the GPO Federal Depository Library Program.  Of particular interest is the Dallas hearing of March 25, 1998 in which issues of rulings without explanation are discussed by Fifth Circuit judges (Chief Judge Carolyn Dineen King, Judge Robert Parker, and Judge Patrick Higginbotham).  At the New York City hearing on April 24, 1998, Yale Law School Professor Judith Resnik makes comments on the topic, as well.
bulletChallenging BIA Summary Affirmance in Federal Court, American Immigration Law Foundation
bulletMary Kenney, How to Challenge an Affirmance Without Opinion, American Immigration Law Foundation
bulletHow to Prevent the Board of Immigrant Appeals (BIA) Summary Dismissal of Your Appeal  -  American Immigration Law Foundation Practice Advisory, March 19, 2002

Court Cases:

bulletArizona v. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978)
bulletBaker v. Pataki, 85 F.3d 919 (2d Cir. 1996) (en banc)
bulletCleveland Board of Education v. Laudermill, 770 U.S. 532 (1985)
bulletConnecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat, 452 U.S. 458 (1981)
bulletDunlop v. Bachowski, 421 U.S. 560 (1976)
bulletGoldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970)
bulletGoss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975)
bulletHarris v. Rivera, 454 U.S. 339 (1981)
bulletIn re Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Adopted Nov. 18, 1986, 955 F.2d 36 (10th Cir. 1992)
bulletMorrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972)
bulletNorth Carolina v. Pierce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969)
bulletTaylor v. McKeithen, 407 U.S. 191 (1972)
bulletTXO Prod. Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. 443 (1993)
bulletUnited States v. Forness, 125 F.2d 928 (2d Cir. 1942)
bulletUnited States of America v. McDonald, 00-10569, (5th Cir. 2002) Pages 82-91
bulletWolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)
bulletYoungblood v. Prudential and Miller, 99-20556 and 99-20808, (5th Cir. 2000)  - Resolution was an affirmance without opinion and unpublished.  The Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court for Youngblood is a major source of the content of this web site.  See also www.youngbloodvprudential.com.

Congressional Hearings:

bulletHouse Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, Oversight hearing  (in PDF format) on “Unpublished Judicial Opinions." - June 27, 2002.  (Hearing transcript in HTML).  The hearing schedule was:
bulletOpening Statement,  Congressman Howard Berman,  Ranking Minority Member on Subcommittee
bulletArthur D. Hellman, Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh Law School
bulletKenneth J. Schmier,  Attorney & Chairman, Committee for the Rule of Law
bulletAlex Kozinski, Judge, Ninth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals
bulletSamuel A. Alito, Jr., Judge, Third Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals & Chair of the Judicial Conference of the U.S. Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure

To read some of the links above, you need Adobe Acrobat Reader.  If you don't have it, click on the Acrobat Reader button below to download:

U.S. Constitution:

bulletFifth Amendment

Inherent Powers Sanctions

General:

bulletRobert J. Kaler, The 'Inherent Power' of the Federal Courts To Impose Sanctions, Gadsby Hannah web page (www.ghlaw.com)
bulletKevin F. Risley, Why Texas Courts Should Not Retain The Inherent Power to Impose Sanctions, Vol. 44, No. 2, Baylor Law Review
bulletNeil H. Cogan, The Inherent Power and Due Process Model in Conflict: Sanctions in the Fifth Circuit, 42 SW. L.J., 1020 (1989).

Cases:

bulletChambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32 (1991)
bulletCrenshaw v. General Dynamics Corp., 940 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1991)
bulletDow Chem. Pacific Ltd. v. Rascator Maritime S.A., 782 F.2d 329 (5th Cir. 1986)
bulletMatta v. May, 118 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 1997)
bullet Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752 (1980)
bulletScaife v. Associated Air Center, Inc., 100 F.3d 406 (5th Cir. 1996)
bulletThomas v. Capital Security Servs., 836 F.2d 866 (5th Cir. 1988)
bulletTopalian v. Ehrman, 3 F.3d 931 (5th Cir. 1993)
 

Last saved on: 11/01/2005

 Home                                    Send comments about this web page to tomglass@juryduty.org